CONCLUSION
This case study looked at incident response frameworks, proactive threat intelligence, staff training and awareness, legal and regulatory issues, and incident response automation. The findings highlight the significance of organised incident response frameworks, such as the NIST framework, in directing organisations' response activities.
Effective data breach response requires proactive threat intelligence, personnel training and awareness, and adherence to legal and regulatory standards. To meet the shifting threat landscape, organisations must constantly update their response plans and employ automation tools to improve their response capabilities. Organisations may limit the effect of data breaches, secure sensitive information, and maintain stakeholder confidence by implementing best practises and embracing new trends in data breach response. Effective data breach response methods are critical for organisations to minimise financial losses, reputational harm, and legal ramifications from these catastrophes.
References:
Anderson, T., Caldwell, B., & Kansa, R. (2019). The Role of Threat Intelligence in Cybersecurity Operations. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 12(1), 4-11.
Cherdantseva, Y., Burnap, P., Blyth, A., Eden, P., Jones, K., Soulsby, H., & Stoddart, K. (2020). Incident Response Automation: Towards a Needs-Based Taxonomy. IEEE Security & Privacy, 18(2), 32-40.
Dahl, J. (2020). Legal Considerations in Data Breach Response. Journal of Legal Technology Risk Management, 6(1), 1-10.
Kawahara, K., & Lumsden, J. (2021). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Training Programs: A Systematic Literature Review. Computers & Security, 107, 102222.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2012). Computer Security Incident Handling Guide: SP 800-61 Rev. 2. Retrieved from https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-61/rev-2/final(Accessed: 2 June 2023).
Comments
Post a Comment